Review of the key characteristics that determine the efficacy of OHS instruments: Report to the Minister of Labour
Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section
Appendix 1 – Respondents
Detailed responses
Respondents to the detailed question set (interview or email questionnaire) came from the following organisations. Except where identified, they contributed their individual knowledge and experience, rather than an official view of the organisation they worked for.
New Zealand
Department of Labour (NZ, Reg1)
Environmental Risk Management Authority (NZ, Reg2)
Civil Aviation Authority (NZ, Reg3; NZ, Reg4)
Federated Farmers of New Zealand (NZ, Ind1)
Employers and Manufacturers Association (NZ, Ind2)
Emergency services authority (NZ, Ind3)
Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (NZ, Union1)
Council of Trade Unions (NZ, Union2)
Australia
SafeWork South Australia (SA, Reg1; SA, Reg2)
WorkCover New South Wales (NSW, Reg1) – organisation submission
Workplace Health and Safety Queensland (Qld, Reg1)
WorkSafe Victoria (Vic, Reg1; Vic, Reg2; Vic, Reg3)
Department of Primary Industries New South Wales (NSW, Reg2; NSW, Reg3)
Utilities provider, Victoria (Aus, Ind1)
Concrete products manufacturer, several states (Aus, Ind2)
Building and construction products manufacturer, several states (Aus, Ind3)
Structural engineer (Aus, Ind4)
OHS consultant, Victoria (Aus, OHS spec1)
OHS consultant, Queensland (Aus, OHS spec2)
Australian Council of Trade Unions (Aus, Union1)
Nurses’ Association, state branch (Aus, Union2)
Canada
WorkSafe, British Columbia (BC, Reg 1)
Alberta Standards and Workplace Safety (Alb, Reg1)
Workers’ Compensation Board, Quebec (Q, Reg1; Q, Reg2; Q, Reg3)
Office of Consumer Affairs, Industry Canada (Can, Reg1)
University of Toronto (Can, Uni1; Can, Uni2)
The Netherlands
Arbonieuwestijl (NL, Reg1)
Stichting van de Arbeid (The Labour Foundation) (NL, Ind1)
Technical University of Delft (NL, OHS spec1)
University of Amsterdam (NL, OHS spec2)
KPMG
Denmark
Technical University of Denmark (Dk, OHS spec1)
Danish Institute of Occupational Health (Dk, OHS spec2)
Roskilde University (Dk, Uni1; Dk, Uni2)
United Kingdom
Health and Safety Executive (UK, Reg1; UK, Reg2; UK, Reg3; UK, Reg4; UK, Reg5; UK, Reg6)
University of Cardiff (UK, OHS spec1)
University of Warwick (UK, Uni1)
London School of Economics (UK, Uni2)
Finland
Finnish Institute for Occupational Health (Fin, OHS spec1)
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Fin, Reg1)
NOHSAC Online Responses
There were an additional 10 Australian and 12 New Zealand respondents to the NOHSAC online survey. Their organisations were not identified but they were all industry end users of codes or guidance material.
In this report, NOHSAC responses are identified as Aus, NOHSAC # (and numbered 1–10) for the Australian responses, and NZ, NOHSAC # (and numbered 1–12) for the New Zealand responses.
