Home > Publications > NOHSAC Reports > NOHSAC Technical Report 5 > Approaches to Surveillance of Exposures

International Review of Surveillance and Control of Workplace Exposures: NOHSAC Technical Report 5

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section

4. Aproaches to Surveillance of Exposures

The following sections present the findings of the review of the selected work environment surveillance systems. The information is primarily presented in tabular form.

4.1   Surveillance systems reviewed

Twenty-four surveillance systems were reviewed as listed in Table 4. The systems in this list are presented in random order. The review is not exhaustive. The systems reviewed were selected on the basis of the criteria listed in Section 2 Literature and Methodology and coverage of the priority hazards and disease outcomes listed in the request for tender. This coverage is shown in Table 9.

Table 4 Systems descriptions
No. Country Name of System Surveillance Method Owner of System
1. USA Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System Comprehensive surveillance system incorporating job exposure matrix Duke University Health System
2. Finland Registry of Employees Occupationally Exposed to Carcinogens (ASA register) Register Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
3. Finland NoiseScan Exposure database>
4. UK National Exposure Database (NEDB) Exposure database Health and Safety Executive (HSE), UK
5. Germany MEGA-database Exposure database Berufsgenossenschaften (BGS)
6. Denmark Danish Surveillance System of Progress in Action Programme for a Clean Working Environment Comprehensive surveillance system Danish National Working Environment Authority
7. Finland International Information System on Occupational Exposure to Carcinogens (CAREX) Exposure database Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
8. USA Hydrocarbon Solvent Exposure Database Other (developed from published literature) Exxon Mobil Biomedical Sciences
9. Finland Finnish Job Exposure Matrix (FINJEM) Job exposure matrix Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
10. Denmark ATABAS Exposure database Danish National Institute of Occupational Health (AMI)
11. USA National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) Workforce systems (labour force survey and workplace observation) National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
12. UK Workplace Health and Safety Survey (WHASS) Workforce systems (labour force survey and workplace observation) Health and Safety Executive (HSE), UK
13. Quebec National Surveillance of Occupational Exposure to HIV Routine surveillance system Canadian Needlestick Surveillance Network
14. Singapore National Database for Noise and Chemical Exposure Exposure database Ministry of Manpower
15. Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Iceland Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire Workforce systems (labour force survey) Nordic Council of Ministers owns copyright of the questionnaire
16. Finland IARC Registry of Industrial Hygiene Measurements in the Pulp and Paper Industry Exposure database FIOH in co-operation with University of British Columbia
17. Finland Dose Registry of Occupational Radiation Exposure Register Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
18. Finland Finnish Product Register Register Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH)
19. Finland Quality of Working Life Survey Workforce systems (labour force survey) Statistics Finland
20. Denmark Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Workforce systems (labour force survey) Danish National Institute of Occupational Health (AMI)
21. Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Iceland Nordic Questionnaire on Working Life and Health Workforce systems (labour force survey) Danish National Institute of Occupational Health (AMI)
22. Sweden Swedish Work Environment Survey Workforce systems (labour force survey) Statistics Sweden
23. Denmark Danish Work Environment Cohort Study Workforce systems (labour force survey and workplace observation) Danish National Institute of Occupational Health (AMI)
24. Europe European Survey of Working Conditions Workforce systems (labour force survey and workplace observation) European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

The 24 systems reviewed are operated from a range of countries and regions as follows: Denmark (4); Europe (1); Finland (8); Germany (1); Quebec (1); Singapore (1); Sweden (1); UK (2); and USA (3). Two of the systems are operated by a collaboration of Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Sweden.

Table 5 is presented as a matrix showing the reference number of the surveillance systems reviewed against OASCC and NOHSAC priority hazards and disease outcomes as provided by these two organisations for the purposes of this review.

Table 5 OASCC and NOHSAC priorities (shaded) and systems reviewed

Table 6 Drivers for establishment of the system
1 Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System13National Surveillance of Occupational Exposure to HIV
2 ASA register14National Database for Noise and Chemical Exposure
3 NoiseScan15Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire
4 National Exposure Database (NEDB)16IARC Registry of Industrial Hygiene Measurements
in the Pulp and Paper Industry
5 MEGA-database17Dose Registry of Occupational Radiation Exposure
6 Danish Surveillance System of Progress in Action Programme
for a Clean Working Environment
18Finnish Product Register
7 CAREX19Quality of Working Life Survey
8 Hydrocarbon Solvent Exposure Database20Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire
9 Finnish Job Exposure Matrix (FINJEM)21Nordic Questionnaire on Working Life and Health
10 ATABAS22Swedish Work Environment Survey
11 National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES)23Danish Work Environment Cohort Study
12 Workplace Health and Safety Survey (WHASS)24European Survey of Working Conditions

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section