Scenarios using a computable general equilibrium model of the New Zealand economy
Appendix D: Short-run impacts of increased immigration scenario
This appendix summarises the results from a short-run simulation of the increased immigration scenario A presented in section 4.1. Scenario A assumed an annual inflow of overseas born of 20,000 per annum additional to that in the baseline. Further, the additional labour supply is fully demand (model) determined. That is, the skill mix of the migrant inflow is consistent with the employment requirements across various sectors, assuming no change in relative wage rates.
The short run assumes a five-year period over which the increased immigration inflow gradually builds. The short run assumes a first year in which the net inflow is 10,000 above baseline, building up to 20,000 above baseline in the fifth year.
The additional inflow of migrants takes the resident New Zealand population in 2011 from its baseline figure of 4.19 million to 4.26 million. This adds another 2.2 percent to the labour force in 2011 or the equivalent of nearly 43,400 full-time equivalent workers for the workforce.
In addition to the reduced magnitude of the immigration 'shock', the short run also imposes the inability of sectors to access additional physical capital stock for production above the baseline level.[50] Consequently, production can expand only through the application of additional labour to the same quantity of capital that was available in the baseline economy.
With such a constraint on the response of the production side of the economy, the impact of the immigration shock in the short run is muted. At the overall level, the short-run impact of the additional labour resources is a 1.1 percent increase in gross domestic product (GDP). With the severely restricted ability to reallocate resources across the sectors in the short run, the composition of above-baseline GDP is similar to that in the baseline. The only noticeable difference among the headline GDP components is the slightly smaller expansion in imports. This difference arises as the additional labour resources marginally reduce production costs across the board, making New Zealand products marginally more competitive than those from overseas.
The short-run impact of the increased immigration scenario is to accentuate the heightened labour intensity of the new economy (Table D1). This is reflected in the employment figure of 2.2 percent above baseline, compared with GDP being only 1.2 percent above baseline.
At the sector level, the relatively labour-intensive machinery and equipment manufacturing sector benefits more than the agriculture and food processing sectors (Table D2). This results in the neutral impact for total export volumes in that the above-baseline figure is the same as that for overall GDP.
As to the occupation breakdown, the increased technical and trades workers fits with the machinery and equipment manufacturing results (Table D3). The results for the other occupation categories also mirror those for the longer-term scenario (see Table 4.3).
One noticeable difference, though, is the result for managers. In this short-run scenario the demand for managers increases by less than that for technicians, whereas this relativity is reversed in the longer run. This difference can be traced to the constraint on capital stock, as capital and managerial labour, to a degree, are complements in the production process. Thus, the inability to access more capital in the short run constrains the increase in demand for managerial skills in response to the increase in immigration. In the longer run, however, the increased availability of capital brings forth an increased demand for managerial skills.
Footnotes
[50] The 0.3 percent result for capital stock for scenario H listed in Table D1 arises from the increase in capital in the owner-occupied dwellings sector. As for all scenarios, this is assumed to change in line with the number of households adjusted for changes in household tenure.
