Home > Publications > Research > Migration Trends and Outlook 2010-2011

Migration Trends and Outlook 2010-2011

5   RESIDENCE APPROVALS

Highlights in 2010/11

  • 40,737 people were approved for residence. This number was below the planning level of 45,000-50,000 and reflects the impact of the recession on migration opportunities.
  • 57 percent of residents were approved through the Skilled/Business Stream, 36 percent through the family streams, and 7 percent through the International/Humanitarian Stream.
  • The proportion of people living and working in New Zealand before applying for residence continues to be high. Eighty-one percent of approved applications were for migrants already in New Zealand, down slightly from 83 percent in 2009/10.
  • The source countries with the highest proportions of residence approvals were the United Kingdom (16 percent), China (13 percent), India (10 percent), and South Africa (8 percent).

5.1   Introduction

This section describes the characteristics of people approved for residence in 2010/11 and immigration trends since 2002/03. Further information about the characteristics of approvals in each residence stream is in chapters 6-8.

5.2   Residence approvals by New Zealand Residence Programme stream

In 2010/11, 40,737 people were approved for residence from 23,149 applications; an average of two people per application. Table 5.1 shows residence approval numbers by New Zealand Residence Programme stream. For residence approvals in 2010/11 by category, see Appendix M.

Table 5.1 Residence approvals by New Zealand Residence Programme stream, 2009/10-2010/11

New Zealand
Residence
Programme stream
Approvals Percentage
of total (%)
Percentage
change from
2009/10
2009/10 2010/11 2009/10 2010/11
Skilled/Business 28,473 23,145 62 57 -18.7
Uncapped Family 9,862 9,597 22 24 -2.7
Capped Family 4,708 5,229 10 13 11.1
International/
Humanitarian
2,676 2,766 6 7 3.4
Total 45,719 40,737 100 100 -10.9

Source: Department of Labour.

The number of people approved for residence was below the minimum of the target range for 2010/11 of 45,000. The number has decreased 11 percent since 2009/10. This is largely due to the decrease in the number of people approved through the Skilled Migrant Category, down 20 percent. There are several reasons for the decrease in Skilled Migrant Category approvals. The relatively weak labour market, particularly in the Canterbury region following the earthquake, has lessened opportunities for Skilled Migrant Category applicants to obtain job offers, a key component of the points system. As a result, fewer applications made enough points to be selected from the Expression of Interest pool. Additionally, a lower number of Essential Skills work visa applicants and approvals since the onset of the recession continues to have an effect on residence approvals.

The continuing decrease in migrants from the United Kingdom, which is likely due to the uncertain job market as well as difficulty selling property in the United Kingdom in the current economic climate, also contributed to the overall decrease.

The number of residence approvals through the Capped Family Stream increased 11 percent. This increase is mainly due to people approved through the Parent Policy (see section 7.3).

Figure 5.1 shows the number of people approved for residence through the streams compared to planned levels under the New Zealand Residence Programme from 2002/03 to 2010/11.

Figure 5.1: Number of people approved for residence compared to the New Zealand Residence Programme planned level, 2002/03 - 2010/11

Figure 5.1: Number of people approved for residence compared to the New Zealand Residence Programme planned level, 2002/03 -  2010/11.

Note: Policies before 2007/08 have been grouped to match the streamed approach to the New Zealand Residence Programme (NZRP) in subsequent years. The programme’s planning level is a range, so the minimum and maximum are shown.

Source: Department of Labour.

Data table for Figure 5.1

5.3   Location of residence approvals

In 2010/11, 81 percent of residence applications were approved in New Zealand (onshore), down from 83 percent in 2009/10 (Figure 5.2). This continues the trend of people living and working in New Zealand before applying for residence, and the immigration policies that support this transition.[44]

Figure 5.2: Proportion of applications approved onshore under the New Zealand Residence Programme, 2001/02 - 2010/11

Figure 5.2: Proportion of applications approved onshore under the New Zealand Residence Programme, 2001/02 -  2010/11.

Source: Department of Labour.

Data table for Figure 5.2

There are significant differences by stream, with 86 percent of Skilled/Business Stream and Uncapped Family Stream applicants, and 85 percent of International/Humanitarian Stream applicants being approved onshore compared to only 49 percent of Capped Family Stream applicants.

The number of Skilled/Business Stream applications that were approved onshore decreased 16 percent between 2009/10 and 2010/11. International/Humanitarian Stream applications decreased 11 percent, Uncapped Family Stream applications decreased 2 percent and Capped Family Stream applications approved onshore increased 4 percent between 2009/10 and 2010/11.

5.4   Number of people per approved application

The average number of people per approved application is an indication of family size. On average, two people were approved per residence application in 2010/11. This average has changed very little since 1999/2000, but varies across the New Zealand Residence Programme streams (Table 5.2).

Table 5.2 Average number of people per approved residence application by New Zealand Residence Programme stream, 2008/09-2010/11

New Zealand Residence
Programme stream
2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
Skilled/Business 2.3 2.3 2.2

Skilled Migrant Category

2.3 2.3 2.1

Other Skilled/Business

2.5 2.5 2.6
Uncapped Family 1.1 1.1 1.1
Capped Family 2.0 1.9 1.9
International/Humanitarian 2.7 2.5 2.6

Samoan Quota and
Pacific Access Category

3.0 2.9 2.9

Other International/Humanitarian

2.4 2.2 2.3
Total 1.9 1.8 1.8

Source: Department of Labour.

The average family size is generally larger for applications approved under the International/Humanitarian Stream than under the other streams. This is mainly due to the larger average family size for applications approved under the Samoan Quota and Pacific Access Category.

The average family size has implications for the New Zealand Residence Programme because it affects the number of applications needed to meet the target range of approvals.

5.5   Source country of residence approvals

Figure 5.3 compares the source countries of residence approvals from 2008/09 to 2010/11. The United Kingdom remains the largest source country of residence approvals (16 percent). The proportion from the United Kingdom increased significantly in the first half of the decade (from 14 percent in 2002/03 to 29 percent in 2005/06), but has decreased since then. China is the second-largest source country (13 percent), followed by India (10 percent) and South Africa (8 percent).

Figure 5.3: Comparison of residence approvals by largest source countries, 2008/09 – 2010/11

Figure 5.3: Comparison of residence approvals by largest source countries, 2008/09 – 2010/11.

Source: Department of Labour.

Data table for Figure 5.3

In 2010/11, residence approvals from the United Kingdom and China decreased 16 percent and 11 percent respectively. Growth in residence approvals were seen from India (up 14 percent) and Samoa (up 10 percent).

5.5.1   Source country by residence stream

The main source countries of migrants in the Skilled/Business Stream are similar to the main source countries for all migrants coming to New Zealand under the New Zealand Residence Programme. This is because the Skilled/Business Stream covers almost two-thirds of migrants coming to New Zealand.

The largest source country of Skilled/Business Stream migrants in 2010/11 was the United Kingdom (19 percent), followed by India and South Africa (both 12 percent), and the Philippines (11 percent). Of these four largest source countries, only migrants from India increased in the last year (up 27 percent from 2009/10).

The United Kingdom (15 percent) and China (13 percent) were the largest source countries of migrants in the Uncapped Family Stream in 2010/11. Compared to 2009/10, the number of migrants from the United Kingdom decreased 7 percent while migrants from China decreased by 9 percent.

China (40 percent), the United Kingdom, and India (both 11 percent) were the largest source countries of migrants in the Capped Family Stream in 2010/11. Over the last 3 years, migrants from China in the Capped Family Stream have grown steadily with 30 percent growth in the last year and 16 percent per year for the previous 2 years.

Two out of the three largest source countries of migrants in the International/Humanitarian Stream in 2010/11 were Pacific countries, reflecting the high proportion of approvals in this stream through the Samoan Quota and Pacific Access Category. Samoa was the largest source country in this stream (34 percent), followed by Burma (13 percent, comprising refugees who came through the annual Refugee Quota programme) and Tonga (12 percent).

For residence approvals in 2010/11 by source country and New Zealand Residence Programme stream, see Appendix N.

5.6   Gender and age of residence approvals

5.6.1   Gender by stream

In 2010/11, more females (51 percent) were approved for residence than males (49 percent). This is mainly due to the high proportion of females in the Uncapped Family Stream and the Capped Family Stream, as shown in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3 Proportion of males and females approved by New Zealand Residence Programme stream and type of applicant, 2010/11

New Zealand Residence
Programme stream
Principal
(%)
Secondary
(%)
Total
(%)
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Skilled/Business 66 34 41 59 53 47

Skilled Migrant Category

65 35 42 58 53 47

Other Skilled/Business

74 26 35 65 50 50
Uncapped Family 39 61 47 53 40 60
Capped Family 45 55 47 53 46 54
International/Humanitarian 54 46 47 53 50 50

Samoan Quota and
Pacific Access Category

55 45 53 47 53 47

Other International/Humanitarian

54 46 42 58 47 53
Total 53 47 43 57 49 51

Source: Department of Labour.

5.6.2   Age by applicant type

The median age of people approved for residence in 2010/11 was 30 years. The median age of principal applicants was 32 years, with 67 percent aged between 20-39. The median age of secondary applicants was 19 years, with 50 percent of secondary applicants younger than 20 years (mainly children of principal applicants).

Figure 5.4 shows the number and proportion of principal and secondary applicants by age group for all people approved for residence in 2010/11.

Figure 5.4: Age of people approved for residence by applicant type, 2010/11

Figure 5.4: Age of people approved for residence by applicant type, 2010/11.

Note: The percentages show the proportion of each type by age group.

Source: Department of Labour.

Data table for Figure 5.4

For the percentage of females granted residence by age and source country in 2010/11, see Appendix O.

5.6.3   Age by New Zealand Residence Programme stream

Information on median age (that is, the age at which half are older and half are younger) gives an indication of the composition of migrants under the respective residence streams. Table 5.4 shows that the median age has changed little over the last 3 years, but there are differences between residence streams.

Table 5.4 Median age of migrants by New Zealand Residence Programme stream, 2008/09-2010/11

New Zealand Residence
Programme stream
Median age (years)
2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
Skilled/Business 28 28 29
Skilled Migrant Category
28 28 29
Other Skilled/Business
34 33 33
Uncapped Family 27 28 28
Capped Family 56 56 57
International/Humanitarian 24 23 23
Samoan Quota and Pacific Access Category
20 21 20
Other International/ Humanitarian
27 25 25
Total 29 29 30

Source: Department of Labour.

The median age of residence approvals was 30 years. This is less than the median age of 36 years for the usual resident population in the 2006 census.[45]

In 2010/11, the median age of Skilled/Business Stream migrants was 29 years, with 80 percent younger than 40 years. This is because the Skilled Migrant Category, which accounts for most people in the Skilled/Business Stream, has an age limit of 55 years. Another factor is the flow-on effect of students applying for residence after the completion of their studies.

The median age for Uncapped Family Stream migrants was 28 years, with 86 percent younger than 40 years.

For Capped Family Stream migrants, the median age was 57 years. Seventy-two percent of migrants in this stream were aged 50 and over, reflecting that most migrants approved through this stream are sponsored parents.

The median age of migrants under the International/Humanitarian Stream was 23 years. This shows that a large proportion of migrants under the International/Humanitarian Stream were young people (64 percent aged under 30 years). Furthermore, the median age of migrants under the Samoan Quota and Pacific Access Category was 20 years, reflecting the trend in young families from the Pacific migrating to New Zealand.


[44] These policies include the Long Term Business Visa; Work to Residence; and Study to Work policies for foreign graduates.