Department of Labour logo for printing

In This Section

Download The Report

The 2008 Rest & Meal Breaks Amendment to the Employment Relations Act 2000 - a snapshot of the impact in the first year

APPENDIX 1: QUANTITATIVE METHOD

The project used a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative research methods:

Phase 1 - Initial survey

The initial survey was a 3-5 minute telephone survey of employers carried out in October - November 2009. This survey was intended to identify the prevalence of trial periods, rest and meal breaks and breastfeeding breaks and facilities among employers, and employer knowledge of these amendments to the Employment Relations Act 2000. Employers were also asked if they were willing to take part in a follow-up survey. Consenting employers were then sent an internet link to the follow-up survey, or were posted a questionnaire, depending on their preference.

Sampling frame

The sampling frame was an employer database, which, when cleaned of incomplete and duplicate entries gave a sampling frame of 33,576 employers. From this a random sample of 3,600 employers was drawn. This random sample was an approximate match of the actual industry distribution in New Zealand.

Response rate

The sample size for the employer survey was intended to be 1,200.

Of the 3,532 employers contacted:

  • 1,391 (39%) completed the initial initial survey, of whom 771 went on to do the follow-up survey (10% by post, 90% online)
  • 324 (9%) declined to take part
  • 685 (19%) were unattainable because of invalid contact details
  • 1,132 (32%) were unavailable when contacted
Firm size distribution

Table 18: Firm size distribution of the initial survey compared to the population
Firm size Number in
initial survey
Percent in
initial survey
Percent in
population[9]
1-19 employees (small) 989 71% 91%
20-49 employees (medium) 206 15% 6%
50+ employees (large) 196 14% 3%
Total 1391 100% 100%

The industry distribution of the sample is shown in Table 19. Note that this table shows the number of firms not the number of employees in each industry.

Table 19 : Industry distribution of the initial survey compared to the population
Industry Number in initial survey Percent in initial survey Percent in population [10]
A   Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 59 4% 14%
B   Mining 4 0% 0%
C   Manufacturing 207 15% 8%
D   Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste 1 0% 0%
E   Construction 109 8% 13%
F   Wholesale Trade 105 8% 6%
G   Retail Trade 233 17% 9%
H   Accommodation and Food Services 88 6% 7%
I   Transport, Postal and Warehousing 71 5% 3%
J   Information Media and Telecommunications 5 0% 1%
K   Financial and Insurance Services 27 2% 2%
L   Rental, Hiring and Real Estate 210 15% 4%
M   Professional, Scientific and Technical 31 2% 10%
N   Administrative and Support Services 42 3% 3%
O   Public Administration and Safety 97 7% 0%
P   Education and Training 28 2% 4%
Q   Health Care and Social Assistance 42 3% 5%
R   Arts and Recreation Services 10 1% 2%
S   Other Services 2 0% 8%
Unknown 20 1% -
Total 1,391 100% 100

Phase 2 - Follow-up survey

The follow-up survey was 8-14 minutes in duration, and administered by postal questionnaire or over the internet, depending on the employer's preference. The aim of the survey was to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of employers' knowledge of the amendments, any changes employers had made, and their perceptions of compliance costs relative to benefits. To maintain respondent confidentiality, responses from the initial and follow-up surveys could not be linked, thus some questions from the initial survey were repeated in the follow-up survey.

Consenting employers from the initial survey made up the sampling frame for the follow-up survey. The sample size was intended to be between 400 and 500 employers.

The follow-up survey was completed online or on paper by 771 employers with a completion rate of approximately 88%. These respondents are a subset of the respondents from the initial survey. Respondents self-reported firm size, industry and location.

Table 20 : Firm size distribution in the follow-up survey compared to the population
Firm size Number of
employers
Percent in
follow-up survey
Percent in
population[11]
1-19 employees (small) 527 69% 91%
20-49 employees (medium) 117 15% 6%
50+ employees (large) 127 17% 3%
Total 771 100% 100%

 

Respondents in the follow-up survey self-reported their industry. However, nearly 19% selected 'Other Services' and described their business. These were allocated appropriate industry codes based on the description.

Table 21: Industry distribution of the follow-up survey compared to the population
Industry Number in follow-up survey Percent in follow-up survey Percent in population[12]
A  Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 40 5% 14%
B  Mining 2 0% 0%
C  Manufacturing 101 13% 8%
D  Electricity, Gas, Water & Waste Services 17 2% 0%
E  Construction 64 8% 13%
F  Wholesale Trade 43 6% 6%
G  Retail Trade 125 16% 9%
H  Accommodation and Food Services 43 6% 7%
I  Transport, Postal and Warehousing 40 5% 3%
J  Information Media and Telecommunications 12 2% 1%
K  Financial and Insurance Services 37 5% 2%
L  Rental, Hiring & Real Estate Services 9 1% 4%
M  Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 70 9% 10%
N  Administrative and Support Services 20 3% 3%
O  Public Administration and Safety 5 1% 0%
P  Education and Training 45 6% 4%
Q  Health care and Social Assistance 60 8% 5%
R  Arts and Recreation Services 10 1% 2%
S  Other Services 28 4% 8%
Total 771 100% 100%

Table 22: Employer location
Location Number Percent
Auckland 230 31%
Auckland and North Island 5 1%
Auckland and South Island 1 0%
Hamilton 29 4%
Wellington 68 9%
Christchurch 55 7%
Canterbury 4 1%
Dunedin 17 2%
Main centres 13 2%
Nationwide 23 3%
North Island 226 30%
South Island 84 11%
Total 755 100%

 


[9] February 2009

[10] Business Demography Statistics, Statistics NZ, February 2009

[11] Statistics NZ, Business Operations Survey, February 2009

[12] Statistics NZ, Business Operations Survey, February 2009