Department of Labour logo for printing

In this section

Downloads

Work-life balance and flexibility in New Zealand

Availability Of Flexible Work

Key findings

  • Almost all businesses offer some flexible working arrangements to all or some of their staff.
  • The most widely available flexible working arrangements are flexible start and finish times on an occasional basis, flexible breaks, part-time work and unpaid leave.
  • The least available flexible working arrangements are buying additional leave in exchange for reduced pay, taking sabbaticals and regularly working from another location.)
  • The availability of flexible working arrangements varies by sector, gender and occupation.
  • Employers report a slight increase generally in the availability of flexible working arrangements for all or some staff since 2005. Employees report an increase in some arrangements and a decrease in others. (These are indicative conclusions only due to survey differences.)

What flexible working arrangements are available?

Employers were asked about a range of working arrangements, and whether these were available to all or some employees in their workplace. Only six enterprises - one half of 1% of all those surveyed - did not currently offer any flexible working arrangements. As the graph below indicates, the most commonly offered arrangements made available to all or some employees were flexible start and finish times on an occasional basis (89%), flexible breaks, (81%), part-time work (78%) and unpaid leave (77%). Flexible start and finish times on a regular basis was available to some or all staff in 63% of workplaces.

The least commonly offered arrangements were buying additional leave in exchange for reduced pay (17%), taking sabbaticals (36%), regularly working from another location (36%) and taking additional paid leave (39%).

Figure 2: Flexible working arrangements available to all or some New Zealand workers (n=1,094)

Figure 2: Flexible working arrangements available to all or some New Zealand workers (n=1,094).

Data Table for Figure 2

Who is offered these options?

All or some...

The graph below shows whether all, some or no staff are offered the most common arrangements.

Figure 3: Who is offered the most common flexible arrangements

Figure 3: Who is offered the most common flexible arrangements.

Data Table for Figure 3

When options are offered to only some staff:

  • occasional flexible start and finish times are more likely to be offered to professional or technical staff (34%) and general staff (26%), except in large organisations (more than 100 employees), where they are more likely to be offered to middle management (38%)
  • flexible breaks are more likely to be offered to professional or technical staff (35%) and/or general staff (30%)
  • part-time work is more likely to be offered to general staff (26%) and/or professional or technical staff (21%)
  • unpaid leave is more likely to be offered to general staff (52%).

Variations by industry type and size

As might be expected, the likelihood of certain types of working arrangements being made available depends partly on the industry.

Table 1: Flexible working arrangements by industry
Sector Less likely to offer More likely to offer
Retail trade Occasional flexibility in start and finish times
Occasionally or regularly working from another location
 
Finance and insurance   Occasionally working from another location
Study leave
Transport and storage, communication services

Study leave
Sabbaticals

 
Education Regular flexibility in start and finish times Flexible breaks
Shift flexibility
Job sharing
Part-time work
Unpaid leave
Sabbaticals
Study leave
Occasionally working from another location
Health and community services sector   Part-time work
Job sharing
Shift flexibility
Study leave
Unpaid leave
Government, administration and defence   Regular flexibility in start and finish times
Flexible breaks
Occasionally working from another location
Study leave
Additional paid leave
Property and business services   Regular flexibility in start and finish times
Flexible breaks
Part-time work
Flexibility in choosing when to work hours
Unpaid leave
Occasionally and regularly working from another location
Study leave
Sabbaticals
Accommodation, cafés and restaurants Regularly or occasionally working from another location Part-time work
Flexibility in when to work hours
Shift flexibility
Construction Part-time work
Job sharing
Shift flexibility
 

Types of working arrangements also vary by business size.

Table 2: Flexible working arrangements by business size
Number of employees Less likely to offer More likely to offer
Fewer than 5 Part-time work
Study leave

Occasional or regular flexibility in start and finish times to all staff
Flexible breaks to all staff

Between 5 and 10 Occasionally or regularly working from another location
Study leave
Flexible breaks to all staff
Between 51 and 100Occasional flexibility in start and finish times to all staff Part-time work
Study leave
Unpaid leave
More than 100 Occasional flexibility in start and finish times to all staff
Flexible breaks to all staff
Part-time work
Job sharing
Occasionally or regularly working from another location
Study leave
Unpaid leave

Availability as reported by employees

What is available?

In the survey of employees, almost all reported that at least one flexible work arrangement was available to them. Most frequently the respondents mentioned they could have:

  • occasional flexibility in start and finish times (71%)
  • unpaid leave, e.g. career break (69%)
  • flexible breaks (67%)
  • part-time work (58%)
  • study leave (55%)
  • regular flexibility in start and finish times (54%).

In contrast, the following options were reported as being available less frequently:

  • regularly working from another location, such as home (23%)
  • buying additional leave in exchange for reduced pay (20%).

It is not possible to directly compare these percentages with what employers reported as being available, as employers were asked what was available to all or some employees.

How it varies

For the most part, there were no significant differences in the availability of various flexible working arrangements when viewed by respondents' age, ethnicity or carer status, except that carers were significantly more likely to report that shift flexibility (e.g. choosing or having input into rosters or shifts) was available to them (42% compared with 34% of non-carers).

Men and women differed in what they reported as being available to them. Men were more likely to report access to:

  • flexible breaks (71% compared with 64% of women)
  • regularly working from another location (28% compared with 20% of women).

Women were more likely to report access to:

  • part-time work (68% compared with 44% of men)
  • job sharing (48% compared with 34% of men).

Availability also varied by occupation. Employees working as a legislator, administrator or corporate manager were more likely to have access to flexible breaks (80%) or occasionally working from another location (49%). Professionals were more likely to have access to taking study leave (77%) or taking a sabbatical (44%).

On the other hand, service and sales workers, and labourers and other service workers were less likely to be allowed to take study leave (42% and 27% respectively) or to occasionally work from another location (22% and 21% respectively).

Has the availability of flexible work changed since 2005?

What do employers tell us?

The following table provides a comparative snapshot of the flexible working arrangements that were reported by employers as being available in 2008 and 2005. The comparison is indicative only, due to differences in the surveys.

Table 3: Comparisons of flexible working arrangements available to New Zealand as reported by employers - 2005 versus 2008 survey results
Working Arrangements 2005 (n=1,100) 2008 (n=795*)
  All Some None Don't know All Some None Don't know
Flexible start and finish times regularly 49% 15% 36% 0% 33% 30% 37% 1%
Flexible breaks 65% 7% 26% 1% 60% 19% 20% 0%
Part-time work 33% 44% 22% 0% 31% 53% 16% 0%
Job sharing 28% 19% 50% 2% 23% 25% 50% 2%
Flexibility in choosing when to work hours 25% 18% 5% 1% 23% 28% 47% 1%
Shift flexibility 23% 13% 61% 2% 25% 21% 52% 2%
Buying additional leave 25% 6% 63% 5% 11% 6% 79% 4%
Occasionally working from another location 11% 29% 59% 1% 16% 40% 42% 1%
Regularly working from another location 4% 15% 80% 1% 8% 28% 63% 0%
Taking study leave 52% 16% 29% 3% 47% 25% 26% 3%

There was a slight increase generally in the availability of flexible work made available to all or some staff as reported by employers. However, in a number of areas there was a decrease in the proportion of organisations offering these arrangements to all staff, with an increase in those offering them to some staff.

The main exception to this pattern was the decrease in the availability of buying additional leave in exchange for reduced pay. This may have been influenced by the introduction of the fourth week of annual leave provided for in the Holidays Act 2003 which came into effect in April 2007.

What do employees tell us?

The indicative comparison between the employee surveys of 2005 and 2008 suggests a decrease in the availability of:

  • occasional flexibility in start and finish times
  • regular flexibility in start and finish times
  • shift flexibility
  • buying additional leave in exchange for reduced pay.

It suggests an increase in the availability of:

  • occasionally working from another location
  • flexibility in choosing when to work your hours
  • regularly working from another location.
Table 4: Comparisons of flexible working arrangements reported by employees - 2005 versus 2008 survey results
Employees 2008 Employees 2005
Working Arrangements (n=1004) (n=2000)
Flexible start and finish times occasionally 71% 87%
Flexible breaks 67% 70%
Flexible start and finish times regularly 54% 62%
Occasionally working from another location 34% 25%
Flexibility in choosing when to work hours 40% 33%
Shift flexibility 38% 51%
Regularly working from another location 23% 15%
Buying additional leave 20% 37%
Total may exceed 100% because of multiple responses.